Global Warming & Climate Change » hypothesis

What types of current climate change are being blamed on global warming?

admin — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:27:04 +0000

Try to determine whether this is a hypothesis with solid evidence to back it up, or one that has not yet been supported.

Are you relieved that global warming has been called off?

admin — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:51:57 +0000

Atmospheric temperatures are plummeting, now the ocean is starting to cool off, and most of the Earth’s glaciers are growing, including Antarctica, and the ocean could soon stop rising entirely, or even shrink. Meanwhile, the IPCC has been caught lying, cheating, and deleting source data, invalidating every report and graph they have ever issued, which were already controversial in their methodology.

Are you relieved that global warming has been called off?
I am neither confused, nor a denier. To deny something would imply it to be fact, yet global warming is nothing but a poorly constructed politically motivated hypothesis.

Which do you think is more certain, that climate change exists, or that it is caused by human activity?

admin — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:38:50 +0000

You may think the second hypothesis would always be less certain because it presumes the result of the first. This is not the intention of the question. You should presume that if climate change is certain, what is the probability it is caused by human activity?

I need some opinions about the effect of global warming from my essay?

admin — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:25:44 +0000

Global warming could cause the Ice to melt, allowing loads of fresh water into the ocean, dropping the salinity, and dissipating the warm and cold currents. Cold currents, which are denser than warm currents, sink to deeper into the ocean. If the cold currents were to disappear, do you think that the abyss would gain heat because of the lack of cold-water flow? Or would it lose heat because the lack of energy from the circulation? All I need is a personal hypothesis.

Why do people think criticism Al Gore amounts to good criticism of climate change?

admin — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:50:07 +0000

What he does, believes and says is completely irrelevant to whether climate change is real. This ad homonim attack is really pointless and just makes you look like an idiot.
A person’s motivation only applies to their actions. He didn’t cause global warming nor did he create the hypothesis. What he is like is completely immaterial.