Global Warming & Climate Change Rotating Header Image

Midwest Watchdog – Global Warming Debate

Global Warming has recently been proven to be a total crock yet there are entire countries trying to tax you and spread your wealth. Ice core data from the last 450000 years tells the true story of an ice covered planet called Earth. We are very fortunate to be in a warm period and we want to design ways to stay in a warm period not fall back into an ice age where an ice sheet will cover all of North America destroying what we call farming. Do not let anyone tell you CO2 causes warming because warming is what causes CO2. Global warming is yet another fabricated “crisis” by which to tax you with. Midwest Watchdog Full live show: tr.im

25 Comments

  1. MidwestWatchdog says:

    I am very much against deforestation and pollution. CO2 is what you breathe out and is NOT pollution.
    Focus your efforts on Sulfur dioxide or some other ACTUAL harmful pollution.

  2. drkstrong says:

    The warmest year in the US is 1934 by one group’s estimates (Columbia) but the official US climate figures are maintianed by NOAA.

    Their record shows that for the US 1998 was the warmest and 2005 was the second warmest with 1934 3rd.

    If you take the 5 year running mean the 30′s are nowhere to be seen in the rankings – you have to be back in the 70′s before you get comparably low temperatures.

    Check it out for yourself at NOAA NCDC. So no BS just the facts.

    PS The US is not “global”

  3. northernpatriot54 says:

    I completely lost respect for the entire Nobel Peace Prize operation when Gore won. My feelings were only solidified when Obama won the damn thing. He was nominated after what, 2 weeks in office? Come one man…

  4. northernpatriot54 says:

    Then why create ridiculous taxes in the first place?

    The idea is that progressive politicians HATE capitalism. By taxing those w/ money and giving to those w/o (or “spreading the wealth” as Obama put it) they are giving in to this idea of a world where everyone is equal. At the same time, none of them are subjected to these same regulations because they are above them.

    Its a power grab. Much like communist leaders of the past, regulating our lives to save us from ourselves…

  5. Jagnole101 says:

    exactly..it seems like only liberals get it, too

  6. grossnesstudeos says:

    more corrupt people are getting it these days. Not that it(nobel peace prize) should be looked at as a bad thing. If a large population gets together and decides to define what deserves a special prize for peace, it would be better with less corruption. I’d say the candidates should be looked at at least two months(possibly more) before being nominated. And they have to actually DO something, no BE something. The obama case is like reverse racism.

  7. grossnesstudeos says:

    Global warming is merely a theory, just like the theories of relativity. It has not been proven indefinitely, and possibly never will.

  8. grossnesstudeos says:

    GW hasn’t been proven indefinitely. It is not a law of the world; it is merely a theory, like the Theories of Relativity. It can be disproven or killed.
    Even if it were a law, it can still be tested. For instance, some scientists continually test gravity to make sure it is constant with the computations of the other scientists.

  9. MaynardGilmour says:

    Wow. I’m surprised someone replied to me after 2 months.

    You’re absolutely right about gravity and relativity. Global warming is a theory that has neither been proven nor has it been disproven.

    It is a fact however, that greenhouse gasses absorb heat and CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Without the greenhouse gasses that are naturally in our atmosphere the Earth wouldn’t be colder and less comfortable.

    That doesn’t mean I’m suggesting that global warming is a direct threat now or in the future.

  10. drkstrong says:

    No, global warming is an observation

    The theory is explaining why it is warming. The AWG is the only theory left standing after 30 years of considering the alternatives

    A theory in science is an explanation of an observation that is consistent with the physical laws that govern the observation and explains the data adequately (within the error bars). So a theory is a big deal unlike a hypothesis

    Thus you can never prove a theory, only disprove it. The AWG theory has yet to be disproved

  11. Jagnole101 says:

    I definitely see your point

  12. grossnesstudeos says:

    Actually, they absorb and reflect infrared rays reflected by the earth. Without the greenhouse gasses, the earth would be colder. But if there was too much, we would probably boil. Lucky for us, less than 1% of the air that we stand in is considered a greenhouse gas.
    I’m surprised that the GW enthusiests/believers are not protesting sports or steam cleaners, since water vapor is just as much a greenhouse gas as CO2.

  13. chotaboy66 says:

    Technically Co2 is not really a greenhouse gas even thou there are traces of co2 in greenhouse gas your right it drives nothing its only there because it follows temps vostok ice core samples prove this ..co2 is heavier than air thats why theres lots and lots of it down tree level.
    Nuclear we have problems with the waste,, but there is free energy out there BUT ohh no we cant have this because it will free us from the clutches of the banking and gov control freaks.
    Good job anyhow 5 stars

  14. chotaboy66 says:

    What do you mean by industrial terraforming whatchdog?
    I know co2 isnt causing global warming and according to NOAA meathane has NOT risen much since around 1990.

  15. germanicelt says:

    I want more CO2. Good for the forests.

  16. fridaysabtu says:

    Watch my video.

    It’s about climate change, earth catastrophes and our planet as we lives in. Continental drift: One huge continent, became 2, became 5 (or 6) and then?

    v=j7I_eFoIk64

  17. thecauseandfx says:

    @grossnesstudeos water vapor is a greenhouse gas, but it cannot drive climate change. The amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold is contingent on the atmosphere’s temperature. Water can only be a feedback effect that amplifies warming.

    CO2 can be either a driver or a feedback. (which renders one of the points in the video description moot.)

  18. tucsonsteven says:

    Ya, didn’t you know that cavemen had kick ass cars back then?

  19. tucsonsteven says:

    Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970′s global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific fact. By the 1990′s temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. Global temperature trends now indicate a cooling. Global warming is a hoax. Al Gore Invented Global Warming just like he did the internet! The planet heats and cools naturally. OH NO THE SKY IS FALLING! LOL

  20. tucsonsteven says:

    Ya I honestly don’t get it, you have scientists saying how easy it would be to terraform Mars, and yet they can’t take the CO2 out of the air here on Earth? I see what you are talking about. And frikin DUH people! LOL.. This just proves that it’s all about makin the money and nothing to do with real science or saving the planet.

  21. stephanemo says:

    Dude, first of all you’re an idiot. Secondly you’re completely wrong!! Did you know tat a volcano just erupted in Iceland??? Holy f!!! OMG!! There’s no ice age?!?! What?? Wow who could’ve guessed that you would be completely wrong??? Wow

  22. MidwestWatchdog says:

    @stephanemo Iceland is not a Super Volcano in my video I specify a Super Volcano could cause an iceage. Super volcanos erupt for 100′s of years and make Mt. St. Helens 1980 eruption look like a gnat fart.
    And yes if the Iceland volcano keeps up for several more months we will see a mini ice age like we have during past eruptions.
    Climate will change it may get hotter or colder. We need to prepare not use it as an excuse to tax people.

  23. killerbeau95 says:

    Its all about control, thats it…

  24. TheMattyFos says:

    @neothemagical I don’t know if Global Warming was ‘created by the government’ I believe it was created as a tool of propaganda by people who wanted to get into power. Gore used it to get tons of money and try to get into a position of power to make even more money. Politicians tried using this propaganda tool with the atmosphere a few years back and we never hear about holes in the atmosphere anymore It’s a way for politicians to get naive youngsters to vote for them. Motivate incompetent voters

  25. GuBB3rGuN says:

    You literally have no idea what you are talking about, go ask scientists, not FOX news, about Climate Change. Or simply watch Potholer54′s videos on global warming, or greenman3610.